TrustRadius Insights
- Easy Study Build Process: Several users have found the study build process relatively easy to learn and navigate, allowing them to …
Merative Clinical DevelopmentFormerly IBM Clinical Development / Watson Health
Overview
What is Merative Clinical Development?
IBM Clinical Development (formerly eClinicalOS) is a cloud-based electronic data capture (EDC) system.
Recent Reviews
Awards
Products that are considered exceptional by their customers based on a variety of criteria win TrustRadius awards. Learn more about the types of TrustRadius awards to make the best purchase decision. More about TrustRadius Awards
Pricing
N/A
Unavailable
What is Merative Clinical Development?
IBM Clinical Development (formerly eClinicalOS) is a cloud-based electronic data capture (EDC) system.
Entry-level set up fee?
- Setup fee optional
For the latest information on pricing, visithttps://www.ibm.com/products/clinical…
Offerings
- Free Trial
- Free/Freemium Version
- Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Would you like us to let the vendor know that you want pricing?
23 people also want pricing
Alternatives Pricing
What is Petofy OPHR?
A Cloud Based Veterinary Software secured with Microsoft Azure that is organized for managing the whole clinic for vets. Its features include adding pets, generating their clinical visits/x-ray reports/surgeries and hospitalizations, generating immunization reports (both automatic and manual…
Product Details
- About
- Integrations
- Competitors
- Tech Details
- Downloadables
- FAQs
What is Merative Clinical Development?
Merative® Clinical Development (formerly IBM® Clinical Development) is a unified, cloud-based Clinical Data Management System designed to help reduce the cycle time to start, amend, and manage clinical studies — enabling life sciences organizations to deliver therapies and innovations faster to their patients.
Boasting a proven track record of over 3000+ clinical trials, in 90+ countries, with 1 million+ participants, the vendor states Merative® Clinical Development will help pharmaceutical, medical device, and CROs to shorten study cycle time and reduce costs.
In addition to its core electronic data capture (EDC) functionality, Merative® Clinical Development offers a fully-integrated portfolio of modules that are designed to suit every trial, including:
Medical Coding with AI- Designed to increase efficiency by leveraging AI to build consistency and reduce errors
eConsent - Deliver quick and easy remote participant consenting without additional EDC integration
Open Platform Data Integration - Allows users to build and automate data connectors with minimal coding
Reporting and Analytics - Provide Data Managers to use pre-built or custom reports to derive single and cross-study insights
Electronic Clinical Outcome Assessment (eCOA) - Strengthens Participant Centricity with live, automatic data sync with EDC
Visit https://www.merative.com/clinical-development to learn more.
Boasting a proven track record of over 3000+ clinical trials, in 90+ countries, with 1 million+ participants, the vendor states Merative® Clinical Development will help pharmaceutical, medical device, and CROs to shorten study cycle time and reduce costs.
In addition to its core electronic data capture (EDC) functionality, Merative® Clinical Development offers a fully-integrated portfolio of modules that are designed to suit every trial, including:
Medical Coding with AI- Designed to increase efficiency by leveraging AI to build consistency and reduce errors
eConsent - Deliver quick and easy remote participant consenting without additional EDC integration
Open Platform Data Integration - Allows users to build and automate data connectors with minimal coding
Reporting and Analytics - Provide Data Managers to use pre-built or custom reports to derive single and cross-study insights
Electronic Clinical Outcome Assessment (eCOA) - Strengthens Participant Centricity with live, automatic data sync with EDC
Visit https://www.merative.com/clinical-development to learn more.
Merative Clinical Development Screenshots
Merative Clinical Development Integrations
- BSI CTMS
- Veeva Clinical Platform
- Argus
- Transperfect
- ALMAC
- Fisher
- Medable
- TRI
- CluePoints
- Catalent
- Optum
Merative Clinical Development Competitors
Merative Clinical Development Technical Details
| Deployment Types | Software as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based |
|---|---|
| Operating Systems | Unspecified |
| Mobile Application | Apple iOS, Android, Windows Phone, Blackberry, Mobile Web |
| Supported Countries | Worldwide usage |
| Supported Languages | 50 + languages and dialects |
Merative Clinical Development Downloadables
Frequently Asked Questions
IBM Clinical Development (formerly eClinicalOS) is a cloud-based electronic data capture (EDC) system.
Medidata Rave EDC, Veeva Vault PromoMats, and Medrio are common alternatives for Merative Clinical Development.
Reviewers rate Support Rating highest, with a score of 8.6.
The most common users of Merative Clinical Development are from Mid-sized Companies (51-1,000 employees).
Comparisons
Compare with
Reviews and Ratings
(33)
Community Insights
TrustRadius Insights are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, 3rd-party data sources. Have feedback on this content? Let us know!
- Pros
- Cons
- Easy Study Build Process: Several users have found the study build process relatively easy to learn and navigate, allowing them to quickly create studies. The availability of tools within the system has been praised for assisting builders throughout the process.
- Excellent Support: Many reviewers highly appreciate the outstanding support provided by the technical helpdesk and project management teams, which has been instrumental in their success with the system.
- Dedicated Client Success Manager: Users value having their own Client Success Manager who provides excellent guidance and assistance throughout their experience with the system. The specific mention of a user's Client Success Manager doing an excellent job highlights this positive aspect.
Slow response to suggestions/issues: Some users have expressed frustration with the slow response from the system's support team when it comes to addressing suggestions or issues related to enhancing the system functionalities.
Non-standard functionalities require additional payments: Several reviewers have mentioned that certain functionalities in the system are not included in the standard package and require additional payments, which can be a disadvantage for some users.
Expensive certification in certain modules: The cost of certification in certain modules, such as Data Migrator, has been highlighted by a number of users as being expensive, making it less accessible for individuals or companies on a tight budget.
Attribute Ratings
Reviews
(1-2 of 2)Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
September 12, 2021
IBM CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT, MY EXPERIENCE
The software is utilized within specific departments for the design and management of clinical trial development. The cloud based format allows for instant shared access to data and information that forms the basis of the research the company carries out. Creating reports of findings is a simple process and the software on a whole is simple to learn.
- Cloud based sharing of information
- Trail Design
- Trail Development
- Menus can be confusing until you have spent time with the software.
- A good internet connection is requiered.
- Information is repeated.
- Presented over all cost savings
- Improved time management
- Replaced other software previously in use.
IBM Clinical Trail offers an improvement on the above as it is considerably easier to navigate and has many more features. The side did seem faster however and could be used via an app which is useful in a busy environment. Both are around the same price bracket give or take.
We use IBM Clinical Development in our clinical department collecting data for all of our studies. It is a useful tool in collecting data from around the world.
- It is highly customizable and easy to program.
- There is a wide variety of data that can be collected from IRB/site information to clinical data.
- ICD provides comprehensive edit language to program for accurate results.
- Page dynamics are very useful when including or hiding certain data questions.
- Reporting is very clunky and most often needs to be programmed by IBM itself. Getting Excel listings isn't user friendly for all employees.
- The date functions are limited when setting up visit windows.
- The User Manual gets to be a bit confusing in areas. It would benefit using direct examples when explaining programming.
- Having the ability to attach documents (i.e., IRB approval in the Site Documents section) would be beneficial instead of getting a separate CTMS.
- The audit trail report is non-functional for us. There is too much data for it to handle.
- We will be saving money using the subscription based pricing instead of per unit costs.
- We have save a lot of money using the EAM module for our adverse event reporting. Our coordinator loves using ICD to keep track of adjudications.
- With the lack of a comprehensive CTMS portion, we spend a lot of time and money tracking the regulatory documents required for the study.
- Our inability to track payments within ICD caused several duplicate payments that we're having to request a refunds.
- It takes us longer to manually get reports together for the various agencies we're required to report to.
I have used Clindex, Oracle Clinical, MediData, and MS Access for clinical trials. The product I had the most success with was Clindex but ICD was a close second. I did not select ICD as it was being used when I joined the company. I became a developer within a few months so I was happy it was, for the most part, so user friendly.